According to Nathanael, the NSA identifies three fundamental elements that actually reduce (rather than just manage) security risks:
While other security tools like EDR, XDR, and intrusion detection systems help manage risk, these three pillars actually eliminate vulnerabilities. "If you did an awesome job at those three things, a nation state would struggle to break into your environment," Nathanael emphasized.
"If you secure your three most critical things first, that would be huge, because most people haven't done it."
One of the most compelling insights from the discussion was that security improvements don't need to be perfect to be effective. Nathanael shared how attempting to achieve 100% perfect security often leads to paralysis and project failure. Instead, he advocates that organizationst:
To illustrate the practical value of Zero Trust implementation, Nathanael shared a striking example of two law firms in the same city. One implemented Zero Trust segmentation while the other didn't. When both were attacked:
For organizations beginning their Zero Trust journey, Nathanael recommends three manageable first steps:
The key message throughout the discussion was clear: don't let perfect be the enemy of good. Start with what you can manage, focus on your critical assets, and build momentum through achievable wins. As Nathanael noted, "If you secure your three most critical things first, that would be huge, because most people haven't done it."
For organizations looking to enhance their security posture, the message is clear: the best time to start your Zero Trust journey is now, and the best place to start is with what you can actually accomplish in the next 90 days.
Watch the full discussion below to hear more insights from Nathanael Iversen on implementing Zero Trust security, including detailed examples and practical advice for organizations of all sizes: